Case details

Court: ca9
Docket #: 15-15610
Case Name: Marc Randazza, et al v. Crystal Cox
PACER case #: 15-15610
Date filed: 2015-03-31
Date terminated: 2015-05-15
Nature of Suit: 3840 Trademark

Documents

Date Filed Document # Attachment # Short Description Long Description Upload date SHA1 hash
2015-03-31 1 0 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLEE. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Transcript ordered by 04/29/2015. Transcript due 05/29/2015. Appellant Marc J. Randazza opening brief due 07/08/2015. Appellee Crystal Cox answering brief due 08/10/2015. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 14 days after service of the answering brief. [9478131] (RT) [Entered: 03/31/2015 09:26 AM]
1 1 Case Opening Packet 2015-04-07 18:33:34 25b821a8e5b4160672b71f44bb08778ea9c2dd2c
1 2 Docketing Letter
2015-04-10 2 0 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: AT): The district court’s order challenged in this appeal did not dispose of the action as to all claims and all parties. In addition, the district court’s denial of appellant’s special motion to dismiss under Nevada’s anti-SLAPP statute is not immediately appealable. See Metabolic Research, Inc. v. Ferrell, 693 F.3d 795 (9th Cir. 2012). Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant shall move for voluntary dismissal of this appeal or show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221 (9th Cir. 1981). If appellant elects to show cause, a response may be filed within 10 days after service of the memorandum. If appellant does not comply with this order, the Clerk shall dismiss this appeal pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. Briefing is suspended pending further order of the court. [9492074] (AF) [Entered: 04/10/2015 04:04 PM]
2015-05-15 3 0 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: ME) Dismissing case for failure to prosecute (Cir. Rule 42-1) Pursuant to Circuit Rule 42-1, this appeal is dismissed for failure to respond to order. (Order dated 04/10/2015). This order served on the district court shall constitute the mandate of this court. [9539728] (ME) [Entered: 05/15/2015 02:39 PM]
2015-05-30 4 0 Filed (ECF) Appellant Mr. Marc J. Randazza Motion to reinstate case after FRAP 42-1 dismissal and Response to motion (to dismiss case for failure to prosecute under Circuit Rule 42-1, to issue mandate (for dispositive orders which act as mandate only), for order to show cause, to vacate briefing schedule). Date of service: 05/29/2015. [9555695] [15-15610] (FA) [Entered: 05/30/2015 12:01 AM]
4 1 Motion for Reinstatement 2015-08-02 02:23:12 2c0440609913245b7aaf1966b30a59f0efb0c70c
4 2 Exhibit 1 - Declaration of FCA
4 3 Exhibit 2 - Declaration of RDG
4 4 Exhibit 3 - Doc 242 Notice of Appeal
4 5 Exhibit 4 - CMECF - Notice of Appeal
4 6 Exhibit 5 - Doc 243 Time Schedule Order
4 7 Exhibit 6 - CMECF - Order For Time Schedule
4 8 Exhibit 7 - 2015-04-10 Docket Entry 2 Order To Show Cause
4 9 Exhibit 8 - 2015-05-15 Docket Entry3 Order of Dismissal
4 10 Exhibit 9 - 2015-05-20 Rhodes Email re Termination of FCAs GT Email Address
4 11 Exhibit 10 - Declaration of HR